Archive for category Human Rights

The Hypocrisy of the Free Tibet Crowd vis-a-vis Xinjiang

Historically, Sinkiang has been at war with the Eastern Chinese. They have identified more with Central Asia than with its current occupier.

The region first supported the Turks, then the Mongols against the Chinese. During the civil war, a separate independent entity existed that was opposed to both the Communists and Nationalists. China didn’t really bring the region under its control until after 1949. Even then, there was more support for Soviet Union than for China. East Turkestan; not Western China. Read on »

4 Comments

The Butcher of Gujarat to be Interviewed After 7 Years?

Narendra Modi, the infamous Chief Minister of Gujarat, has had a full 7 years of near complete immunity and full reign over his state in India despite overseeing a near holocaust of Muslims in 2002. With his implicit, and sometimes explicit permission, Hindu nationalists slaughtered, raped and displaced Muslim men, women and children.

Official figures put the death toll at 2000 in total with another 250 missing. Actual numbers must be much higher – probably closer to 10,000. Over 100,000 people, both Hindus and Muslims, were displaced when Modi’s crazed followers destroyed entire neighborhoods and cities. It has even been called a genocide by some in the Indian media. Tehelka has the full report. Read on »

Comment on this

SA’s mess with the Zimbabweans (and others)

Lessons learnt from South Africa’s renowned Truth and Reconciliation Committee are lost among its people.

Zimbabwean refugees escaping from Mugabe are being:

raped and injured, being rejected by hospital staff or charged exorbitant fees. Read on »

Comment on this

Obama to withhold detainee abuse photos

The Washington Post is reporting that the Obama Administration is changing its position on releasing photos of abuse of detainees held in military custody abroad, claiming that it:

“strongly believes that the release of these photos, particularly at this time, would only serve the purpose of inflaming the theaters of war, jeopardizing US forces, and making our job more difficult in places like Iraq and Afghanistan.”

Earlier, Obama had earlier pledged to release all photos:

“The parties have reached an agreement that the Defense Department will produce all the responsive images by May 28, 2009.”

Now that the deadline is approaching, Obama has changed his mind. Apparently, he’s afraid that Cheney may prove to be right that we may not be safe under Obama:

“I think to the extent that those [Bush-era] policies were responsible for saving lives, that the administration is now trying to cancel those policies … means in the future we’re not going to have the same safeguards we’ve had for the last eight years.”

Public release of those photos will not serve any purpose. The world now knows that detainee abuse was committed at military prisons across the world, some even approved by the Pentagon. The photos will only incite violence against American soldiers and allies abroad, especially in Afghanistan and Iraq, placing them in further danger.

As far as the ACLU and the American plaintiffs of the lawsuit are concerned, they too are aware of the abuse. The photos will serve no purpose, apart from the gratuitous satisfaction of being righteous.

Comment on this

The U.N. Farcical Rights Council

The US has taken its rightful place at the U.N. Human Rights Council, joining such human rights stalwarts as Cuba, Jordan, Kyrgyzstan, Bangladesh, China and Saudi Arabia. US Ambassador to the UN, Susan Rice, claims ecstatically:

“Obviously, there will always be some countries whose respect and record on human rights is sub-par…”

Sub-par? Cuba has a sub-par human rights record? How about a terrible human rights record?

Looking at the membership of the council before the current elections, I am shocked to see that the following countries are members: Read on »

Comment on this