Archive for category Human Rights

The Real Manchurian Candidates But Not as Glamorous as Denzel or Sinatra

The Sinatra Version

The Sinatra Version

So, the Manchurian Candidate movies were apparently based on reality! According to a recent report and corresponding law-suit

…The [victims/plaintiffs] allege that the government tested various drugs, biological and chemical agents, and gases during the fifties, sixties, and seventies without their informed consent (some poison gas shells and grenades from the Chemical Warfare Service laboratory at Edgewood are pictured above). The plaintiffs want the defendants to notify all affected veterans and tell them what chemicals they were given, release them from their secrecy oaths, and provide them with health care and disability compensation.

The government has also admitted some of it:

For its part, the government has acknowledged the existence of the tests and claims that it is actively trying to help the affected veterans.

In an expected move:

… the government maintains that the Edgewood veterans do not have a case because, among other things, the statute of limitations has expired, the veterans have not exhausted all administrative remedies, and sovereign immunity bars this suit. “Dismissal of this lawsuit will not deprive plaintiffs or other veterans of redress for any injuries that they suffered as a result of testing at Edgewood Arsenal,” said the government in its response. “Congress and the executive branch continue to investigate, compile relevant documents and other information, and develop and implement appropriate responses and remedies for veterans who participated in the tests….These provisions, rather than litigation, are proper avenues for relief.”

Even if the government did conduct these experiments, the best way to bring an end to this saga, and provide justice to all involved, would be to provide any compensation desired by the plaintiffs without admitting liability.

Heck, the government’s job description involves protecting its citizens. When it doesn’t, it is responsible even when the statute of limitation has expired.

Comment on this

The Hypocrisy of the Free Tibet Crowd vis-a-vis Xinjiang

Historically, Sinkiang has been at war with the Eastern Chinese. They have identified more with Central Asia than with its current occupier.

The region first supported the Turks, then the Mongols against the Chinese. During the civil war, a separate independent entity existed that was opposed to both the Communists and Nationalists. China didn’t really bring the region under its control until after 1949. Even then, there was more support for Soviet Union than for China. East Turkestan; not Western China. Read on »

4 Comments

The Butcher of Gujarat to be Interviewed After 7 Years?

Narendra Modi, the infamous Chief Minister of Gujarat, has had a full 7 years of near complete immunity and full reign over his state in India despite overseeing a near holocaust of Muslims in 2002. With his implicit, and sometimes explicit permission, Hindu nationalists slaughtered, raped and displaced Muslim men, women and children.

Official figures put the death toll at 2000 in total with another 250 missing. Actual numbers must be much higher – probably closer to 10,000. Over 100,000 people, both Hindus and Muslims, were displaced when Modi’s crazed followers destroyed entire neighborhoods and cities. It has even been called a genocide by some in the Indian media. Tehelka has the full report. Read on »

Comment on this

SA’s mess with the Zimbabweans (and others)

Lessons learnt from South Africa’s renowned Truth and Reconciliation Committee are lost among its people.

Zimbabwean refugees escaping from Mugabe are being:

raped and injured, being rejected by hospital staff or charged exorbitant fees. Read on »

Comment on this

Obama to withhold detainee abuse photos

The Washington Post is reporting that the Obama Administration is changing its position on releasing photos of abuse of detainees held in military custody abroad, claiming that it:

“strongly believes that the release of these photos, particularly at this time, would only serve the purpose of inflaming the theaters of war, jeopardizing US forces, and making our job more difficult in places like Iraq and Afghanistan.”

Earlier, Obama had earlier pledged to release all photos:

“The parties have reached an agreement that the Defense Department will produce all the responsive images by May 28, 2009.”

Now that the deadline is approaching, Obama has changed his mind. Apparently, he’s afraid that Cheney may prove to be right that we may not be safe under Obama:

“I think to the extent that those [Bush-era] policies were responsible for saving lives, that the administration is now trying to cancel those policies … means in the future we’re not going to have the same safeguards we’ve had for the last eight years.”

Public release of those photos will not serve any purpose. The world now knows that detainee abuse was committed at military prisons across the world, some even approved by the Pentagon. The photos will only incite violence against American soldiers and allies abroad, especially in Afghanistan and Iraq, placing them in further danger.

As far as the ACLU and the American plaintiffs of the lawsuit are concerned, they too are aware of the abuse. The photos will serve no purpose, apart from the gratuitous satisfaction of being righteous.

Comment on this

The U.N. Farcical Rights Council

The US has taken its rightful place at the U.N. Human Rights Council, joining such human rights stalwarts as Cuba, Jordan, Kyrgyzstan, Bangladesh, China and Saudi Arabia. US Ambassador to the UN, Susan Rice, claims ecstatically:

“Obviously, there will always be some countries whose respect and record on human rights is sub-par…”

Sub-par? Cuba has a sub-par human rights record? How about a terrible human rights record?

Looking at the membership of the council before the current elections, I am shocked to see that the following countries are members: Read on »

Comment on this