<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>the Global Observatory &#187; Global Warming</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theglobalobservatory.com/category/global-warming/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theglobalobservatory.com</link>
	<description>A lot of caustic and sarcastic humor, stupid opinions, canned news and scanty revelations on politics, foreign affairs, social and fiscal issues, and much else from an independent, yet conservative and Republican, perspective from the Pacific Northwest. Yeah, right.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 22:48:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Awww: Indonesian Palm Oil Giant Breaks Greenpeace&#8217;s Heart</title>
		<link>http://www.theglobalobservatory.com/2010/04/awww-indonesian-palm-oil-giant-breaks-greenpeaces-heart/</link>
		<comments>http://www.theglobalobservatory.com/2010/04/awww-indonesian-palm-oil-giant-breaks-greenpeaces-heart/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 22:26:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>observer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberalism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theglobalobservatory.com/?p=1878</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It has just come to my attention that Greenpeace might need a little something to help it get over the reality that no rational corporate entity will support its radical, environmental agenda unless there&#8217;s some benefit in it for the company.
Sinar Mas, an Indonesian firm specializing in palm oil production, could not justify following Greenpeace&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.theglobalobservatory.com/2010/04/awww-indonesian-palm-oil-giant-breaks-greenpeaces-heart/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Polar Bears: Children of Global Warming</title>
		<link>http://www.theglobalobservatory.com/2010/03/polar-bears-children-of-global-warming/</link>
		<comments>http://www.theglobalobservatory.com/2010/03/polar-bears-children-of-global-warming/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 07:36:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>observer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theglobalobservatory.com/?p=1579</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So, global warming might actually have led to the evolution of polar bears. And, apparently:
&#8230;polar bears have already survived a global warming that affected the northern hemisphere from 130,000 to 115,000 years ago, when the Greenland ice sheet and the Arctic ice cap were smaller than now.
Global warming zombies, however, had to spin the story:
Professor [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.theglobalobservatory.com/2010/03/polar-bears-children-of-global-warming/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. Climate Action Partnership: 3 Down, Few More To Go</title>
		<link>http://www.theglobalobservatory.com/2010/02/u-s-climate-action-partnership-3-down-few-more-to-go/</link>
		<comments>http://www.theglobalobservatory.com/2010/02/u-s-climate-action-partnership-3-down-few-more-to-go/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 00:40:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>observer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberalism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theglobalobservatory.com/?p=1531</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The United States Climate Action Partnership, an organization created to appease climate change fanatics/liberals, is slowly coming apart at the seams.
The WSJ is reporting that BP, ConocoPhilips and Caterpillar have quit the group, because:
USCAP was focused on getting a climate-change bill passed, whereas [the quitters are] increasingly concerned with what the details of such a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.theglobalobservatory.com/2010/02/u-s-climate-action-partnership-3-down-few-more-to-go/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Global Warming: Tell That to UK</title>
		<link>http://www.theglobalobservatory.com/2010/01/global-warming-tell-that-to-uk/</link>
		<comments>http://www.theglobalobservatory.com/2010/01/global-warming-tell-that-to-uk/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 08:49:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>observer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theglobalobservatory.com/?p=1352</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
This is global warming for you&#8230; cold, cold, cold.
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.theglobalobservatory.com/2010/01/global-warming-tell-that-to-uk/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>India Rebuffs Obama&#8217;s Enviro-Crazy Agenda</title>
		<link>http://www.theglobalobservatory.com/2009/07/india-rebuffs-obamas-enviro-crazy-agenda/</link>
		<comments>http://www.theglobalobservatory.com/2009/07/india-rebuffs-obamas-enviro-crazy-agenda/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 05:40:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>observer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[India]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theglobalobservatory.com/?p=792</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[India&#8217;s position, let me be clear, is that we are simply not in the position to take legally binding emissions targets
So says India&#8217;s Environmental Minister Jairam Ramesh.
Right on.
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.theglobalobservatory.com/2009/07/india-rebuffs-obamas-enviro-crazy-agenda/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nobody Wants to Pay for Al Gore&#8217;s Global Warming; Jobs More Important</title>
		<link>http://www.theglobalobservatory.com/2009/07/nobody-wants-to-pay-for-al-gores-global-warming-jobs-more-important/</link>
		<comments>http://www.theglobalobservatory.com/2009/07/nobody-wants-to-pay-for-al-gores-global-warming-jobs-more-important/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 23:28:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>observer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theglobalobservatory.com/?p=469</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to the latest Rasmussen polls:
&#8230; 56% of Americans say they are not willing to pay more in taxes and utility costs to generate cleaner energy and fight global warming.
Ouch.
&#8230; [only] 21% of Americans are willing to pay $100 more per year for cleaner energy and to counter global warming. Only 14% are willing to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.theglobalobservatory.com/2009/07/nobody-wants-to-pay-for-al-gores-global-warming-jobs-more-important/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Senate: Protect Us From Obama&#8217;s EnviroCrazy Agenda</title>
		<link>http://www.theglobalobservatory.com/2009/06/senate-protect-us-from-obamas-envirocrazy-agenda/</link>
		<comments>http://www.theglobalobservatory.com/2009/06/senate-protect-us-from-obamas-envirocrazy-agenda/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 03:35:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>observer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theglobalobservatory.com/?p=413</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Obama mama&#8217;s latest &#8220;change&#8221; includes a bill that mandates:

cut emissions by 17% below the level in 2005 by 2020, then by 83% by 2050
national limits and requires polluters to acquire emissions permits
Permits are either free (85%) or bought at auction (15%)
Permits can be traded, allowing major polluters to offset surplus emissions

At what cost?! Millions of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.theglobalobservatory.com/2009/06/senate-protect-us-from-obamas-envirocrazy-agenda/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ahh, so we are not going to sink after all&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.theglobalobservatory.com/2009/05/ahh-so-we-are-not-going-to-sink-after-all/</link>
		<comments>http://www.theglobalobservatory.com/2009/05/ahh-so-we-are-not-going-to-sink-after-all/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 06:12:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>observer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theglobalobservatory.com/?p=64</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The BBC is now reporting that a scientific team led by Jonathan Bamber has found that melting ice in the Antarctic may lead to 3.3m rise in sea level, about half of what all doomsayers have been claiming all this time and scaring the hell out of us. Of course, this is still very bad [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.theglobalobservatory.com/2009/05/ahh-so-we-are-not-going-to-sink-after-all/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

