<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>the Global Observatory &#187; Abortion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theglobalobservatory.com/category/abortion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theglobalobservatory.com</link>
	<description>A lot of caustic and sarcastic humor, stupid opinions, canned news and scanty revelations on politics, foreign affairs, social and fiscal issues, and much else from an independent, yet conservative and Republican, perspective from the Pacific Northwest. Yeah, right.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 22:48:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Foolproof Contraceptive? It&#8217;s Called Abstinence</title>
		<link>http://www.theglobalobservatory.com/2010/05/foolproof-contraceptive-its-called-abstinence/</link>
		<comments>http://www.theglobalobservatory.com/2010/05/foolproof-contraceptive-its-called-abstinence/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 22:36:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>observer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberalism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theglobalobservatory.com/?p=1942</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Seattle Times had an article a few days back on the search for the perfect contraceptive, because, apparently, the pill isn&#8217;t good enough:
But despite the freedom in career and family planning the pill extended  to so many women and couples, it has not fulfilled one big hope. Fifty  years on, about half of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.theglobalobservatory.com/2010/05/foolproof-contraceptive-its-called-abstinence/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oklahoma&#8217;s Abortion Law: Unconscionable or Reasonable?</title>
		<link>http://www.theglobalobservatory.com/2010/04/oklahomas-abortion-law-unconscionable-or-reasonable/</link>
		<comments>http://www.theglobalobservatory.com/2010/04/oklahomas-abortion-law-unconscionable-or-reasonable/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 22:50:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>observer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberalism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theglobalobservatory.com/?p=1911</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Guilt-free abortion is one of the perks in a socialist/communist society, but, thankfully, we are moving away from that model here in the U.S.A. one state at a time. Oklahoma has passed a law, over-riding an earlier veto, that:
&#8230; requires doctors to show women an ultrasound of their fetus and point  out its physical [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.theglobalobservatory.com/2010/04/oklahomas-abortion-law-unconscionable-or-reasonable/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

